Reflections

Nature's God Church Blog

Archive for the ‘Deism’ Category

A belief in God through reason and nature.

Forgiveness

Posted by Reflections on February 23, 2010

At one time I had a problem with Christians and Christianity. I was raised as a Christian. I was baptised as a Christian, a Southern Baptist, no less. I came to the realization that what I had believed was almost certainly not true, and frankly, I felt betrayed. Now I question myself. Who had the problem?

I never have felt that anyone personally misled me, certainly not intentionally. I was misled by the misguided and misled, people who did not just believe. They knew. The “blame” lay further down the line. I was deluded by the deluded. I felt that Christianity had violated the trust I had placed in its doctrines. It is easy for a former Christian to feel that way. Who is to “blame”? Why, “they” are. They, the ubquitous, faceless “they misled me”. Could I name names now? No. Could I name the names of Christian leaders who are misleading people now? Well, certainly. Pick a leader, any Christian leader. Are these leaders bad people? Probably not. They were probably misguided themselves, spectacularly misguided. And they are spectacularly misguiding others. Bad people? Probably not. Their intent is pure. Their message is not.

Is Christianity bad? Certainly not, not the way it is preached and practiced by many, probably most, Christians. Christianity has some of the most loving and forgiving characteristics of any revealed religion. Do I believe in or agree with Christian doctrine? Certainly not! To go back to being a Christian I would have to believe in things that don’t make sense. Can Christians be bad? They can be horribly bad, especially when they throw their weight around and try (and often succeed) to impose their worldview on the general population.

In my opinion that’s why we have Christian Deists. I’ve gotten to know John Lindell pretty well over the past couple of years, and he has told me his story several times. He was a Baptist minister when he came to the realization that he could no longer believe the awful things that Christian doctrine said he must believe. He gave up his ministry. John invented his own religion, and then later he found Deism. It was exactly like his own invented religion. John is a Biblical scholar. He sees Deism in the life of Jesus. He believes Jesus was a Deist, a man, not divine. John is a Deist first and a Christian Deist second. I believe that deep down inside John would love to be a Christian, but he cannot accept the horrible things in the Bible. So John takes the good and leaves the rest. John sees Deism in Jesus’ words and actions. I have problems seeing the same thing. I can’t look past the other things.

Does that mean that John filters Jesus’ message from the Bible? Yes, but he is very up-front about it. I think we all filter things that way. We see what we want to see. We hear what we want to hear. We deemphasize some parts and apply emphasis to other parts. We take a subject and make it our own. Humans do that. I do celebrate humanity, even with all our imperfections. These imperfections make us human. Christianity is based on the Bible, which has some of the most inspirational and uplifting messages on Earth, and it has some positively dreadful and ghastly parts. And both the good and the ghastly are attributed to God. So Christians face a dilemma. They want desperately to believe the good parts, so they ignore the bad parts. Not even the fiercest hellfire and damnation preacher encourages his flock to go out and stone someone to death these days. The best Christians suppress the distasteful and stress the glorious. It is the only way they can deal with their dilemma.

The Christian message of love and forgiveness represents two of the best facets in a flawed jewel. When you add salvation to the mix, you get a very powerful message. I cannot, however, make the bad parts go away, so I cannot be a Christian. Like many who have left Christianity, I felt betrayed. People I trusted had told me that the Bible was inerrant, the word of God. I believed, then I found that what they told me was false. So I turned my back on Christianity, a very human reaction. I rejected it all.

There is nothing about getting older that makes you any wiser unless you learn along the way. We learn from the good people, and we learn from the flawed people. We learn from the good experiences, and we learn from the bad. But we only become better ourselves when we apply what we have learned and improve our own behavior. I have taken a page from the Christian Bible and have decided to forgive Christianity. I forgive the well-intentioned Christian ministers and lay leaders who filled my head with nonsense, because they put some good and useful lessons in there too. I forgive the hypocrites who populate so many churches; they have taught me well through their bad examples. I forgive myself for turning a blind eye to the atrocious things in the Bible. I studied more than the parts my mentors wanted me to read. There is much good in there, along with much that is bad or absurd if taken literally. Allegorically, much of the Bible is beautiful.

So I have forgiven Christianity. It is the Christian thing to do. A good friend who went from being an Atheist to being a devout Christian has told me several times, “Don’t judge Christianity by Christians.” I do, of course, but I get the drift of his advice. Just as we should not judge a book by its cover, we should not condemn the good along with the bad. There is much about Christianity to dislike, but to discard the positive aspects along with the negative is very short-sighted. We should eat the fruit and discard the rind. I think Ziggy got it right. “You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.” Kahlil Gibran perhaps said the same thing a bit more poetically, “The optimist sees the rose and not its thorns; the pessimist stares at the thorns, oblivious to the rose.”

To withold forgiveness is to be negative and pessimistic. Try forgiving yourself for having been unforgiving.

Posted in Church, Deism, Life, Philosophy, Religion, Spirituality | Leave a Comment »

Reason and experience

Posted by Reflections on January 3, 2010

Reason and experience are inseparable. Without reason to sort, analyze and classify our experiences, we do not turn this information into intelligence. We use reason to compare our latest experiences to our own earlier experiences and to the experiences others have shared with us. Without reason, experience is just raw data, not useful for much.

But reason does not operate in a vacuum. Reason cannot function without data. Experience is the way we gather data to feed our reasoning minds. Reason needs food for thought.

I was raised like many in America. I went to church. I come from a tiny town of 250 souls in rural Illinois. I lived a block from the church. Of course I went to church. And when we moved to the country, we went to the closest church, which was four miles away. When I got my license I drove all the kids to church. It was a Southern Baptist mission. And we learned about Jesus. I wanted so much to be saved. I went through the motions. I tried to convince myself I was saved. I was baptized, of course.

Then I went away to college. Reason began to matter more than what I had been taught. I began to experience things that a youngster in rural Illinois does not get to experience. I applied reason to those experiences, and reason told me that many of my early experiences did not make sense in the harsh light of mature reason. I began to question why I ever had believed the things I had been taught as a child.

As I grew in experience and honed my reasoning skills I discovered gaps in my experience. Reason directed my search to discover replacement beliefs for the childhood beliefs that had withered and crumbled under the harsh light of reason. Reason had taken away those old, comforting beliefs. It was up to reason to find a replacement. Life has to have meaning, doesn’t it? My search led east to Buddhism, Zen, Shinto, Confucianism, Taoism. The east was not a good fit. I turned west.

More experience. More reason. I became a voracious reader and consumed massive amounts of information. Experience and reason. The search continued. I married, started a family, settled on a career, rose through the ranks. I lost a brother, a sister, my father, my mother and countless older relatives. Life was moving on, whether I was ready or not.

When did I come to Deism? I cannot rightly say. It was many years ago after much reasoning and experience. When did I realize I was a Deist? That is a relatively recent experience.

Here we are again, back at experience and reason. There was a time when I would have said, “Too bad I did not come to this conclusion earlier.” But that was when I believed in regrets. Regret is like worry, a complete waste of time and energy. Regret does not fix anything. Regret does not solve anything. We either learn from our experiences, or we do not. If we reason, we learn. If we fail to apply reason to our experiences, we learn nothing. Regret is unreasonable.

Because of reason and a mature perspective, I now get a lot more out of my experiences. I also get more out of other people’s experiences. I better understand the relationship between reason and experience, and life makes more sense. I have no regrets that I arrived at this understanding relatively late in life. Many people never reach this stage in their spiritual development at all!

Posted in Deism, Freethought, Life, Philosophy | Leave a Comment »

The journey

Posted by Reflections on December 3, 2009

A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. That is also the way the journey ends. Nearly a year ago a number of us embarked upon an adventure. A dozen fellow Deists and I decided to share our feelings, beliefs and experiences in a book. Thus, the Contemporary Deism Project was formed. Now, the book is complete, and so is the journey. The book has entered the editing and publishing process. In a few short weeks it will take that final step from potential to actual, and the world will get to see it, warts and all.

To say that it has been challenging collecting the thoughts of over a dozen Deists and transforming them into a meaningful whole  is the biggest understatement I’ve made all year. Deist: So that’s what I am! is far from perfect. It is ambitious, diverse and inclusive. Even the most extreme Deist theories and sub-categories get a hearing. There is something for everyone: something to cheer and something that probably will make you go, “huh.”

For everything that you cheer, I want to give credit to the wonderful contributors who worked so hard to explain what it is to be a Deist, and for everything that makes you scratch your head, I want it to be clear that it’s the editor’s fault.

Now a new journey begins. We enter a strange new land where we spend our energies letting people know that we have produced something of value, and we would like for them to benefit. Deists value reason, nature and experience. We hope you will experience this new book so that you can decide whether or not you can say, “so that’s what I am !”

(this post is also available on our new book blog at http://sothatswhatiam.com/blog/)

Posted in Deism, Freethought | Leave a Comment »

You can do magic

Posted by Reflections on September 21, 2009

Do you believe in magic? If magic is that which fills us with awe and wonder, magic is everywhere. Every day is filled with magic. Nature itself is one miracle after another. What could be more magical? Look at a seed. How does that turn into a plant? How does a caterpillar turn into a butterfly? Life is filled with wonder.

Do I believe in miracles? I see them happen every day. The fact that I am here at all involves several miracles. I have three wonderful children and four grandchildren. There are no greater miracles on Earth.

Do I believe in religious miracles? Do I think that the natural laws have sometimes been suspended on behalf of a person or a people? No, but I believe that other people believe. I see miracles every day, but I’ve never seen a supernatural miracle. I don’t believe in elves or fairies or leprechauns or ghosts. I just don’t believe in the supernatural at all. I do believe in the power of human imagination. I do believe that some of life’s great lessons are best told in myth and allegory. I believe that stories and fables and parables and myths are wonderful vehicles for teaching and inspiring. Some of the most moving lessons I have ever learned I learned through stories.

But when we start treating myth and allegory as reality, when we take ancient texts full of important lessons intended to help us to live better lives and take these stories literally, we can lose the important core lessons in a lot of detail that might have made sense to desert tribes 2,000 years ago, but doesn’t make sense now. That was then, and this is now. We need to winnow out the important lessons from the chaff.

There are so many natural miracles that I cannot spend my time chasing other people’s dreams. The magic of reality far exceeds any person’s imaginings.

Posted in Deism, Life, Nature, Philosophy, Religion, Spirituality | Leave a Comment »

A glass of white

Posted by Reflections on August 31, 2009

It was a day of rest and relaxation when I began this piece. The evening was pleasant. A glass of white wine sounded good. The sun was down, but its glow still reddened the undersides of the clouds in the purple distance. In some ways life has been a bit more challenging lately. The heat has been oppressive. Work has been demanding of my time and energy. But challenges make us stronger. Surviving them is a measure of our success. Without challenges we grow soft and weak. Competition is natural. But cooperation is also part of human nature. So, when should we compete, and when should we cooperate? This post borders on the political, but the concern is societal. How we solve these problems requires that we end politics as usual. The politicians in this country are mostly not solving anything.

All of life is ultimately competitive. In nature we compete to survive. In the school of hard knocks, we must survive the knocks, and if necessary, we must knock harder than our competition to survive. Life is not fair. Thinking that it is could be fatal. But humans have advanced beyond mere survival. And we have become better survivors because we have learned to cooperate. Two humans can achieve much more than one. There are things that one person can never accomplish alone. Some things take a dozen persons working in concert to be successful.

Cooperation can be voluntary or involuntary. Involuntary cooperation is coercion, cooperation by force. Cooperation advances us and makes us better as a species, but we step backwards if the cooperation is involuntary. As we develop and grow as a species we try to be more cooperative, but if resources become scarce, we have no option except to compete. The key, it would seem, is to keep ensuring that there are abundant food, water, shelter and other necessities so that we do not have to be so competitive just to survive.

What happens when certain people are uncompetitive? What do we do when those who do not compete well become poor? There are several options. We can take resources away from those who do compete well and give these resources to the uncompetitive. We have done that for some time, and the practice does not decrease the number of poor. We can try to make the uncompetitive more competitive, but if resources remain scarce, it will be difficult for the poor to rise up with their newly acquired strength and skills and be competitive enough to rise up out of poverty.

I believe that there is no single thing we can do to magically make everything better. I look at the problem through Deist eyes. I look to reason and nature. It stands to reason that we should continue to increase our productivity, because that will increase the availability and lower the price of products and goods available for everyone. We should conserve our natural resources, because we have only one Earth, and its resources are finite. We must be careful about overpopulation There was a time, a few thousand years ago, when it made sense to say, “Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it…” That time has long since passed.. More people means more consumption of natural resources and the food and products we produce. We cannot sustain infinite growth in a finite space.

We must educate our children. The poor are poor for many reasons. It may be because they are denied opportunity. That is an injustice, and we must correct this injustice wherever we may find it. Some remain poor because they do not take advantage of opportunity. This too is an injustice, and we must work harder to build character in our children so that they long for and strive for a better life. Growing up to be a top gang member or a successful drug dealer is not the type of competition and achievement we wish for our children.

But we must also remember not to punish the successful for being successful. If you work hard and achieve much it is very dispiriting to have half the fruits of your labor confiscated because people in a position of power believe they know better how to spend your money than you do.

We can fight nature and try to “have dominion over” nature , but we can never defeat nature. The laws of nature will not be violated. Involuntary cooperation is coercion. Involuntary charity is robbery. Involuntary service is slavery. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are our natural rights. Denying them is tyranny.

These were my thoughts over that glass of white wine. It was pretty good wine. I wish I could share it with every politician in the land.

Posted in Deism, Ethics, Freethought, Life, Nature, Philosophy, Spirituality | Leave a Comment »

Deist Bible

Posted by Reflections on August 16, 2009

Yes, a Deist Bible. It doesn’t sound possible does it? Nonetheless, I have compiled a Deist Bible and have decided to publish it online. Outrageous? You will have to judge for yourself.

So far I have not been persuaded that the idea of a Deist church cannot work, so I guess it is not too much of a stretch for me to suggest that there can be a Deist Bible. If Deism is a religion, and there are those who will argue that it is not, it should not only be possible, but desirable for Deists to come together and agree enough on some basics that will allow us to maintain a fellowship. Also, Deists everywhere can benefit from a framework that will help them organize their thoughts, beliefs, hopes and aspirations, and these are the reasons behind the Deist Bible. But let me not give it away. I do want you to check it out.

Life is wonderful, but it has been proceeding at an insane pace. The family is fine. The grandchildren are our joy. The four-year old was a joy staying with us this weekend. Work during this recession is so successful that I can hardly stand it. (Help is on the way!) The heat and drought here in Central Texas are brutal, but life goes on (except for the plants that have died).

There are so many positive things going on that I just have to share, and I hope things are going as well for you!

Posted in Church, Deism, Life, Religion | Leave a Comment »

Comfortable in your own skin

Posted by Reflections on July 12, 2009

“Whatever is flexible and flowing will tend to grow; whatever is rigid and blocked will wither and die.” The Tao Te Ching contains much of such wisdom. As we learn and grow in experience, we gain wisdom. We seek, we examine, we weigh. We reject that which makes no sense to us. Those things that we deem worthy and sensible we may choose to incorporate into our own worldview. And the wisdom that we hold dearest remains uppermost in our minds.

The environment we live in is important, but what is inside us is vital. We hunger for truth, but where truth actually lies is something we must ultimately decide for ourselves. We must think critically and form our own opinions. Allowing someone else to dictate to us what is true and what is not makes us slaves to another’s beliefs. If our minds cannot be chained, we will remain free, even if our bodies should be enslaved.

All good people seek peace, harmony and comfort. Some of us cannot find these in organized religion. Peace? Too often organized religion leads to conflict, hate and war. Harmony? When organized religions assert that they are right, and all other religions are wrong, someone has to be wrong. The result is anything but harmony. Comfort? Comfort comes from acceptance. If you find comfort in your beliefs, I would never want to deny you that comfort. Your faith may be among the most important things in your life. But you must bear in mind that I have found peace and comfort in my own beliefs, and these will be profoundly disturbed if you try to force your beliefs, or worse yet, your practices, onto me against my will. I think it is fair that we all be free to evangelize. By evangelization I mean spreading the word and being witnesses to the joy we find in our faith. I distinguish this from proselytizing, which I define as an intrusive and pushy way of trying to convert someone. When we evangelize we make our beliefs public, out where people can see and hear them so that interested parties can be exposed to our way of thinking. Some people want to be left alone. I don’t think we have any right to suppress the free exchange of ideas or to force our beliefs on others.

As a youth I adopted the faith of my family and peers. I tried very hard, but I never felt comfortable in that faith. I drifted for many years, frankly, not caring much about faith at all. Later, I sampled many beliefs – Eastern, Western and New Age – but I did not find comfort in any of these beliefs. Then, some time ago, I read Paine’s Age of Reason, and I realized I was a Deist. I found Paine’s critical style wearisome after a while. I think critical Deism is necessary at first, but ultimately we must figure out what is right about Deism, not just what is wrong with other religions. While I knew I was a Deist, my comfort level increased greatly when I discovered positive and affirming forms of Deism.

Shira Tehrani said that you can’t do anything about the length of your life, but you can do something about its width and depth. Deism has broadened my horizons, and I now feel a profound appreciation of nature and life. I weigh important questions against my beliefs. I seldom find conflicts. I am even comfortable in relationship to my former faith. I think there is much wisdom there if people don’t take things too literally.

I have come to the realization that when religion takes the blame for something terrible, the real culprit is groupthink. When people act like mobs and let other people do their thinking for them, bad things happen. Religion is not the problem, groupthink is the problem. When people stop thinking for themselves and let their religious, philosophical, ethnic, racial, or ideological leaders do their thinking for them, individuality will be trampled, rights will be abridged, people will be hurt and lives will be lost. You can stand up to the Taliban, whether they are wearing turbans or thumping a sacred text or sitting on a school board. Think for yourself, and stand up for your rights. Do not be intimidated. Be comfortable in your own skin.

Posted in Deism, Freethought, Life, Nature, Philosophy, Religion, Spirituality | Leave a Comment »

Through Deist eyes

Posted by Reflections on June 24, 2009

The people who get on in this world are the people who get up and look for the circumstances they want, and, if they can’t find them, make them. — George Bernard Shaw, playwright

How does Deism help us live better lives and be better people? I think reason, nature and experience are key not only to Deism, but to life itself. Take the quote above. There is nothing particularly Deistic about it at first glance. But think further. We are born with intelligence and reasoning powers. They are part of our human nature. Ingenuity, inventiveness and imagination are part of our nature. We also have many negative qualities in our natural makeup. There are, unfortunately, people who sit on their backside and let opportunity pass them by. Then they complain about how unfair life is. What makes sense? I believe that using reason to recognize and emphasize the positive qualities over the negative makes us better persons and makes the human race better across the board. Deists just require their religion to make sense along with everything else they choose.

As mankind has seen the advantages that cooperation brings, we have long gathered together and built societies. When hunter-gatherers saw the advantages agriculture provided, civilization was born. It is in our nature to try to make life better, and the general direction for the development of  our civilization has been to the better. Individually and collectively, we sometimes misstep, and something that we think will lead to making our lives better actually makes things worse. We learn from our experiences, and try not to make the same mistakes twice. When we fail to learn from our experiences, we regress as individuals and as a species.

If you are a Deist, try this experiment. Take a quote that you find meaningful, one that rings true and offers wisdom. Better yet, make sure that quote is an affirmation, something very positive. Look at that quote through Deist eyes. How can your chosen bit of wisdom improve your life? Is it consistent with your Deist worldview? What does this exercise tell you about your worldview? This exercise will take practice. It is worth the time. Remember: it is your understanding of life, nature and God that counts with Deism. With organized religions you are supposed to just accept your religion’s tenets and views as your own. Not doing so is “wrong”. It is a sin to not believe exactly as you are told. You must believe what someone else tells you is the word of God. Acceptance of tenets or dogma is not optional if you want to remain true to an organized religion’s beliefs. Such is not the case with Deism. You are responsible for deciding what makes sense to you. To me, believing nonsense is just not an attractive prospect. I will decide which principles I should live by, ones that are best for me, my family and, in my opinion, for society. Interestingly, when given the choice, a Deist tends to make choices that are similar to those of other Deists. That makes sense. What is reasonable is reasonable. Still, we Deists have the freedom of choice. We are servants only to reason and common sense, not to a church or a sacred text or anything the clergy claims to be the will of God.

As we progress in our Deist spirituality we grow in many ways. M. Scott Peck describes four stages of human spiritual development. By Peck’s definition, Deists would be at Stage III on the path to enlightenment. Peck was a Christian, not a Deist, but in his definition of Stage III, he describes Deism perfectly. So if by becoming Deists we achieve Stage III spirituality, how then do we progress to Stage IV (which seems desirable)?

Peck uses Christian, Sufi and Zen mystics as examples of Stage IV spirituality, but when we examine his definition for Stage IV – … the stage where an individual starts enjoying the mystery and beauty of nature. While retaining skepticism, he starts perceiving grand patterns in nature… – we see a clear path for Deists to progress spiritually. I can, for instance, look back now at Christianity with a certain serenity and acceptance, not of the literalist and fundamentalist view of Christ, but the wonderful lessons that we can learn from the Christ story. Christ’s message is part of the overall celebration of our human spirituality. As Peck puts it, “not …mythological stories interpreted as literal accounts, but rather as one loving the whole, the outcasts, overcoming prejudices, incorporating inclusiveness and unconditional love, this, with the courage to be as oneself – that is what I must follow for my salvation.” In Peck’s description we see that we don’t have to have some special or magical redemption to arrive at salvation.

When Deists look at the world through eyes that understand that nature is the ultimate arbiter in life, and reason is the best way to make sense of things, we come to many realizations. We begin to understand that no one has a monopoly on truth. If anyone tells you that they do possess the only real truth, they are probably telling to think just like they do. I think that as we progress spiritually we find that natural religion is the basis for all religion. Even the revealed religions have a lot of value if we discard the literalist and fundamentalist interpretations that have been supplied by the clergy over the years. And then as we grow as Deists I think we find that even reason is not enough. Some people cannot distinguish reason from rationalization. When we open our Deist eyes to all the possibilities we begin to see our commonalities with other belief systems. I believe we become less judgmental, more intuitive and more accepting. When we look at life through Deist eyes we come to know that nature is speaking to us, just not with words. I believe that is how God communicates; otherwise, how would we hear? What language would God use?

The most spiritual people I know attain a type of serenity that tells you they have moved past religious strife and conflict. The most spiritual people I know don’t get hung up on literal interpretations of any religious texts. They lead by example, and you end up wanting to follow them. You follow because what they say rings true to you. And when you look at these spiritual people through Deist eyes you tend to choose those whose message not only rings true, but it also is grounded in common sense. That is our Deist heritage.

always always

Posted in Deism, Life, Nature, Philosophy, Religion, Spirituality | Leave a Comment »

Idealism

Posted by Reflections on May 27, 2009

Idealism is critically important to advancing the development of our species, but idealism can also be an impediment to our present. Idealists are people of vision, dreamers who see a better and brighter future. Idealists see a world without poverty or disease where there is no war or crime. The idealist imagines humankind without hunger, want or fear.

The world of the pragmatist is based firmly in reality. While the head of the idealist is in the clouds, the feet of the pragmatist are planted solidly on the ground. Pragmatists see the future, but they know how much hard work there is to building a path that leads to that future. They expend more energy on the path than the destination.

We need idealism. We need people with imagination and initiative. We need people who will lead us to a better life. But along with constructive and inventive idealists we get other kinds of idealists. We get people who are not satisfied with what is who are willing to tear down the present in an attempt to force us to adopt their idea of a better future. We see idealists who insist that everyone adopt their vision, even though it is narrow. Some idealistic visions fail to take important factors into consideration, which can almost certainly lead to ultimate failure. Not all change is progress. The law of unintended consequences renders its verdicts despite our best intentions. And then there are those idealists who make a lot of noise, but otherwise expend no useful energy to move us along the path to a better day.

Pragmatists too have their flaws. The term stick-in-the-mud is colorful, and it accurately describes people who oppose any and all change. They claim to be rooted in the safety and certainty of the present, but they are mired in the past, and they are barriers to the future. They are risk-averse. They spread fear to rally people to their side.

Both idealists and pragmatists ask, “what if?” The idealist is asking, “what if we try this and succeed?” The pragmatist responds, “what if we consider all the challenges as well as the rewards?”

Who is right? Both are, and we need both. We need idealists to keep pushing us forward, always questioning the status quo. We need pragmatists pointing out the dangers and impediments. We need dreamers, and we need cool heads to prevail as we weave our way through the pitfalls.

So where do Deists fall on the spectrum between idealism and pragmatism? We are at either extreme and at all points in between. We are individualists. We let our consciences guide us. We represent every stripe, every color of the political spectrum. We are innovators, and we have led destructive movements as well. We are altogether human, so we exhibit human virtues and flaws.

Johnetta Betsch Cole told us, “While it is true that without a vision the people perish, it is doubly true that without action the people and their vision perish as well.” Sometimes idealists are also people of action. When they are, I think their idealism is tempered by pragmatism. And I think this is for the better. Let us be both. Let us have vision, and let us take up the hard work to achieve that vision with our eyes and ears wide open.

Posted in Deism, Life, Philosophy | Leave a Comment »

Reason, intuition and more

Posted by Reflections on May 10, 2009

Galileo said, “I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended for us to forego their use.” I strongly agree, but I must add that this same God endowed us with imagination, intuition and inspiration. I think we should celebrate all these gifts. In my opinion it is the combination of all these attributes that makes us distinctly human.

I believe our ability to reason is our most important human characteristic. Reason and intellect distinguish us from mere animals. David Pyle said, “Without faith, reason is cold… but without reason faith is blind.” Reason alone can be cold. Spock, of Star Trek fame, is the personification of reason, but he is also human. So even though this half-human suppresses his emotions, we can warm to him, because he does not lack imagination, intuition or inspiration. Our passions can make us all too human when they exceed reasoning’s ability to keep them under control. But I would not suggest that we suppress passion too much. At a healthy level it provides drive and energy to push us forward when we encounter obstacles. We know what happens when passion is at its worst. And while you can be too passionate, I don’t know that you can be too reasonable, not unless you suppress your other human characteristics.

My notion of God must make sense to me. And life simply makes more sense to me with God than without. My faith is a faith based on reason, but not on reason alone. My intuition tells me it is sensible to bridge the gap between knowing and believing. Nature inspires me to believe that there is a reason that we exist, even if our intellect cannot yet identify that reason. Is it imagination that attributes this mystery to God? Is God simply the name we give to this mystery? I am not so arrogant that I claim to know. I am suspicious of anyone who makes such claims. I claim only to believe, and I don’t expect anyone else to believe except on their own terms.

So how can any religion or philosophy ever be true if it treats us as though we are all the same when clearly we are not? If a belief system does not celebrate individuality, I recommend that we proceed with caution. We can benefit from the experience of others, but we must think for ourselves. What works for one may not work for another. We are all born with potential, but we do not have the same beginnings; we should not expect to achieve the same ends through the same means.

We are reasoning beings. It doesn’t make sense to me that we should ever abandon reason, no matter what. I believe our reason and our intellect should guide us, and I think we should take advantage of all the gifts we are given to reach our full potential. Sense, reason, intellect, imagination, intuition and inspiration are positive qualities I think we all should nurture. Be wary of those who suggest that you should hide or suppress any of these traits. Question whether such people are looking out for your best interests, and consider the possibility that someone else is doing their thinking for them.

Posted in Deism, Freethought, Life, Nature, Philosophy, Religion | Leave a Comment »