Reflections

Nature's God Church Blog

Archive for the ‘Church’ Category

Forgiveness

Posted by Reflections on February 23, 2010

At one time I had a problem with Christians and Christianity. I was raised as a Christian. I was baptised as a Christian, a Southern Baptist, no less. I came to the realization that what I had believed was almost certainly not true, and frankly, I felt betrayed. Now I question myself. Who had the problem?

I never have felt that anyone personally misled me, certainly not intentionally. I was misled by the misguided and misled, people who did not just believe. They knew. The “blame” lay further down the line. I was deluded by the deluded. I felt that Christianity had violated the trust I had placed in its doctrines. It is easy for a former Christian to feel that way. Who is to “blame”? Why, “they” are. They, the ubquitous, faceless “they misled me”. Could I name names now? No. Could I name the names of Christian leaders who are misleading people now? Well, certainly. Pick a leader, any Christian leader. Are these leaders bad people? Probably not. They were probably misguided themselves, spectacularly misguided. And they are spectacularly misguiding others. Bad people? Probably not. Their intent is pure. Their message is not.

Is Christianity bad? Certainly not, not the way it is preached and practiced by many, probably most, Christians. Christianity has some of the most loving and forgiving characteristics of any revealed religion. Do I believe in or agree with Christian doctrine? Certainly not! To go back to being a Christian I would have to believe in things that don’t make sense. Can Christians be bad? They can be horribly bad, especially when they throw their weight around and try (and often succeed) to impose their worldview on the general population.

In my opinion that’s why we have Christian Deists. I’ve gotten to know John Lindell pretty well over the past couple of years, and he has told me his story several times. He was a Baptist minister when he came to the realization that he could no longer believe the awful things that Christian doctrine said he must believe. He gave up his ministry. John invented his own religion, and then later he found Deism. It was exactly like his own invented religion. John is a Biblical scholar. He sees Deism in the life of Jesus. He believes Jesus was a Deist, a man, not divine. John is a Deist first and a Christian Deist second. I believe that deep down inside John would love to be a Christian, but he cannot accept the horrible things in the Bible. So John takes the good and leaves the rest. John sees Deism in Jesus’ words and actions. I have problems seeing the same thing. I can’t look past the other things.

Does that mean that John filters Jesus’ message from the Bible? Yes, but he is very up-front about it. I think we all filter things that way. We see what we want to see. We hear what we want to hear. We deemphasize some parts and apply emphasis to other parts. We take a subject and make it our own. Humans do that. I do celebrate humanity, even with all our imperfections. These imperfections make us human. Christianity is based on the Bible, which has some of the most inspirational and uplifting messages on Earth, and it has some positively dreadful and ghastly parts. And both the good and the ghastly are attributed to God. So Christians face a dilemma. They want desperately to believe the good parts, so they ignore the bad parts. Not even the fiercest hellfire and damnation preacher encourages his flock to go out and stone someone to death these days. The best Christians suppress the distasteful and stress the glorious. It is the only way they can deal with their dilemma.

The Christian message of love and forgiveness represents two of the best facets in a flawed jewel. When you add salvation to the mix, you get a very powerful message. I cannot, however, make the bad parts go away, so I cannot be a Christian. Like many who have left Christianity, I felt betrayed. People I trusted had told me that the Bible was inerrant, the word of God. I believed, then I found that what they told me was false. So I turned my back on Christianity, a very human reaction. I rejected it all.

There is nothing about getting older that makes you any wiser unless you learn along the way. We learn from the good people, and we learn from the flawed people. We learn from the good experiences, and we learn from the bad. But we only become better ourselves when we apply what we have learned and improve our own behavior. I have taken a page from the Christian Bible and have decided to forgive Christianity. I forgive the well-intentioned Christian ministers and lay leaders who filled my head with nonsense, because they put some good and useful lessons in there too. I forgive the hypocrites who populate so many churches; they have taught me well through their bad examples. I forgive myself for turning a blind eye to the atrocious things in the Bible. I studied more than the parts my mentors wanted me to read. There is much good in there, along with much that is bad or absurd if taken literally. Allegorically, much of the Bible is beautiful.

So I have forgiven Christianity. It is the Christian thing to do. A good friend who went from being an Atheist to being a devout Christian has told me several times, “Don’t judge Christianity by Christians.” I do, of course, but I get the drift of his advice. Just as we should not judge a book by its cover, we should not condemn the good along with the bad. There is much about Christianity to dislike, but to discard the positive aspects along with the negative is very short-sighted. We should eat the fruit and discard the rind. I think Ziggy got it right. “You can complain because roses have thorns, or you can rejoice because thorns have roses.” Kahlil Gibran perhaps said the same thing a bit more poetically, “The optimist sees the rose and not its thorns; the pessimist stares at the thorns, oblivious to the rose.”

To withold forgiveness is to be negative and pessimistic. Try forgiving yourself for having been unforgiving.

Posted in Church, Deism, Life, Philosophy, Religion, Spirituality | Leave a Comment »

Deist Bible

Posted by Reflections on August 16, 2009

Yes, a Deist Bible. It doesn’t sound possible does it? Nonetheless, I have compiled a Deist Bible and have decided to publish it online. Outrageous? You will have to judge for yourself.

So far I have not been persuaded that the idea of a Deist church cannot work, so I guess it is not too much of a stretch for me to suggest that there can be a Deist Bible. If Deism is a religion, and there are those who will argue that it is not, it should not only be possible, but desirable for Deists to come together and agree enough on some basics that will allow us to maintain a fellowship. Also, Deists everywhere can benefit from a framework that will help them organize their thoughts, beliefs, hopes and aspirations, and these are the reasons behind the Deist Bible. But let me not give it away. I do want you to check it out.

Life is wonderful, but it has been proceeding at an insane pace. The family is fine. The grandchildren are our joy. The four-year old was a joy staying with us this weekend. Work during this recession is so successful that I can hardly stand it. (Help is on the way!) The heat and drought here in Central Texas are brutal, but life goes on (except for the plants that have died).

There are so many positive things going on that I just have to share, and I hope things are going as well for you!

Posted in Church, Deism, Life, Religion | Leave a Comment »

Experience

Posted by Reflections on May 4, 2009

To most Deists, reason, nature and experience would be considered the three pillars of Deism. I would add imagination and intuition. Islam has five pillars, so why not Deism? We speak often of reason and nature. Let’s consider experience for a moment.

Life is brief. We can’t each experience everything individually, so we rely on the experience and wisdom of those we know and trust to guide us in making our choices. And when we do not personally know a person who claims to have wisdom or knowledge, we must rely on our reason and judgment to assess their claims.

What is the influence of experience on our beliefs? As humans, most of us have innate inclinations towards the spiritual, the religious and the superstitious. We are then raised to believe and act in certain ways, so those who raise us have a profound influence on our early development. Our first religious beliefs are usually the beliefs (or lack thereof) of those in our immediate environment. Cultural influences are very powerful. Language, religious belief, morality, all are facets of our culture and our experience. When we grow up we are building on an immense amount of human experience as focused through our culture.

But at some point in our lives almost all of us become independent. Like birds that leave the nest, we begin to make our own decisions and take responsibility for our own actions. In a sense, we are reborn and become our own persons. This act of rebirth can occur more than once in a lifetime. Sometimes this transformation is profound; sometimes it is subtle, but it is a natural occurrence among people who develop normally. What and whom we trust and believe can be altered by these transformations or rebirths, sometimes dramatically. Sometimes we come to the realization that what we used to believe was merely what someone else believed, but the new person we have become no longer believes such things.

The theme of rebirth is repeated often in various religions. For instance, many of us are familiar with the story of a remarkable person:

  • whose birth was heralded by a star in the east
  • who had no history between the ages of twelve and thirty
  • who walked on water, cast out demons and healed the sick
  • who was transfigured on a mountain and delivered a sermon on the mount that was recorded by his followers
  • who was crucified between two thieves, buried in a tomb and resurrected
  • who was called the lamb of God, the good shepherd, the bread of life, the son of man, the Word and the fisher
  • who was the way to heaven, whose name was written as the “road to salvation”, “the Way, the Truth and the Life”
  • who the prophets said would reign for a millennium

All these familiar themes come from the story of Horus, also known as Iusu, and they are described in detail in Egypt at least as far back as 1700 BCE. The very similar story of Mithras, the Persian sun god who was born in a cave during the winter solstice, goes back to between 3000 and 2400 BCE.

So the rebirth we all go through has been retold allegorically in many religions that date far back into pre-history. The themes are similar: rebirth and the discovery of the divine within each of us; these are keys to happiness in the afterlife. The basic themes encourage us to be better people. Certainly, there is a lot of excess baggage attached to these themes, but applying reason and logic to the messages allow us to sort out the wisdom from the opinions of the humans who wrote the texts and the clergy who influenced them.

This is natural religion, using our innate human abilities, which include reason, a conscience and an ability to tell right from wrong with minimal instruction. These innate tendencies and beliefs have been described as natural law. Whatever you call them, and whatever religion shaped you in your early years, you end up drawing your own conclusions based on your experience and your intuition, which is based on your experience.

In my view we do not communicate with God directly. I see no credible evidence that we do. Some people put their faith and trust in sources that claim to possess information given them directly by God. I do not find such claims reasonable. If others do, that is fine as long as they do not interfere with my right to believe as I choose. I would not interfere with their rights. But even if I reject their claims of divine revelation, that does not mean that I reject the entirety of their message. That too would be unreasonable. Religions have brought great comfort to untold millions of people. There is good in all of them. Reason and experience allow us to sort out the good from the bad.

I have quoted Mark Twain before: “We should be careful to get out of an experience only the wisdom that is in it – and stop there; lest we be like the cat that sits down on a hot stove lid. She will never sit on a hot stove lid again – and that is well; but also she will never sit down on a cold one anymore.” As we are reborn into Deism we often reject our former beliefs, and in my opinion that is healthy and normal, but we should also remember another Twain quote: “When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years.” When we are first reborn we see the foolishness in the beliefs that we left behind very distinctly, but when we mature in our new beliefs, we may see that not everything that we rejected was bad. Maturity and experience should be our guides to sorting out the useful from the useless so that we do not lose the valuable wisdom that has helped make us what we are.
(also posted at Positive Deism and on Nature’s God)

Posted in Church, Deism, Philosophy, Religion | Leave a Comment »

Release

Posted by Reflections on January 14, 2009

The Oracles of Reason modernization is now available for download. My thanks to everyone involved. I could not have gotten there without you.

Do any of us ever get anywhere totally on our own? Even when we walk somewhere by ourselves we tread on shoes and wear clothes that are the product of someone else’s labor. Someone had to grow and process and prepare the food with which we fueled our bodies today. Someone paved the road or sidewalk or blazed the trail. Someone made it safe and keeps it that way. Someone nursed us and treated us when we were sick or injured and helped us survive long enough to take that walk. Someone helped us learn to take our first steps.

The reward for overcoming a challenge is the opportunity to face the next challenge. That is not an attempt to be glib. Think of all the people denied such opportunities. So many have done so much for me over the course of my life that I have the honor of putting the skills they have taught me to some kind of good use. It would be disrespectful and inconsiderate to throw away the efforts of my parents and relatives, my teachers, my mentors and my friends and not put their hard work and these wonderful opportunities to good use.

I am examining the option to publish the Oracles as a book. I am not so interested in profit, but I am interested in the broadest dissemination for the modernized work. I live in the online world, but that is not where everone resides. So the search for a publisher begins. I am crafting a book proposal. And a copy of the 1784 version of Oracles is in the mail. It will be the original version that will be modernized to book form.

I hope you will read the Oracles. I solicit your honest commentary and feedback.

Release. Relief. Recharge. Repeat.

Posted in Church, Deism, Life, Religion | Leave a Comment »

Doing things for others

Posted by Reflections on November 3, 2008

How is it that we derive satisfaction from helping out other people? I suppose we crave approval and gratitude, but that can’t be it, at least not the entire reason. I don’t buy this notion that we actually perform acts of altruism only for selfish reasons. Can there be an element of self in a selfless act? Certainly. Is selfishness the primary driver behind altruism? I think that is absurd and insulting.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a little enlightened self-interest. I think we should perform service to our nation and community within the limits of our abilities and desire. Compulsary altruism is not altruism. It is coercion.

It would be easy to talk politics on this subject, but I will resist the temptation.

So how does altruism fit with Deism? Quite well, I think. True altruism is voluntarism. It would seem to me that freethinking people who base their beliefs on reason would find service to others to be a perfectly reasonable thing to do. It has always seemed reasonable to me to help people out who are in need due to no fault of their own even if you have no expectation that they will ever return the favor. My wife is not a Deist, and in her belief system it is held that whatever you do, good or bad, will come back to you threefold. I am not sure I agree with their math, but it certainly has been my experience that if you perform good acts and treat people well, with respect and dignity, good things will come to you (and yes, the opposite is just as true).

I am not sure that we have any immortality other than the good (or bad) opinions people will have about us when we’re gone. So how do you want to be remembered?

Posted in Church, Life | Leave a Comment »

Deism and Individualism

Posted by Reflections on October 23, 2008

As I look forward to the Texas Freethought Convention, it occurs to me that when attending I will be on pretty familiar ground. For over 20 years I wore Army ID tags that said “NO REL PREF”. I really had no religious preference during much of my adult life. Finding Deism supplied a piece I’m not sure I knew was missing. I had long ago realized that the religion I grew up with was simply false. Abandoning that faith had left a hole that nothing else had ever quite filled. Deism is a good fit for me and fills that hole nicely.

Then recently I read Letter to a Christian Nation by Sam Harris. I probably agree with three quarters of what he has to say, but I disagree strongly with the remaining 25%. Harris blames many of the world’s ills on religion, and on the surface, these look like valid charges. Where I disagreed with Harris and applied his critical arguments against religion to Deism, I felt pretty strongly that Deism as I know it withstands his criticism.

More importantly, when I examine the atrocities Harris and other Atheists attribute to religion, I see a very likely misattribution. In virtually every case of heinous crimes committed in the name of religion, the blame could be attributed to groupthink. When people stop thinking individually, when they act like automatons and fail to examine things critically, bad things often can happen. Religion can be the culprit, so if the argument is against organized religion, I think many of the criticisms of Harris are valid. But Hitler’s message was primarily nationalistic, not religious. Stalin’s message was idealogical, not religious. When people start acting as groups, and individualism is lost, they can commit acts they never would consider as individual thinking persons.

Deism celebrates reason, and it is not a very “organized” religion. It encourages rational, critical thinking. I personally believe that Deism encourages individualism. Having said that, I have seen Deists with herd mentalities. They celebrate a narrow form of reasoning that is negatively critical of revealed religion. They bash Christianity mercilessly, and they are anti-Semitic. Some of them just parrot and mouth the words. I am not sure how much they think before they speak. Even among Deists, groupthink is a risk.

Every Deist is different, but some Deists are not as different as other Deists. Whether you are a Deist or not, it can be dangerous to let other people do your thinking for you.

Posted in Church, Deism | 2 Comments »

Texas Freethought Convention

Posted by Reflections on October 20, 2008

The Texas Freethought Convention will be held this weekend in Austin. I will definitely be going. It seems only fair, since my wife and her sister drove up to Wisconsin to a religious retreat over the weekend.

Actually, she is encouraging me. The convention sounds like a hoot. I am really looking forward to it. I have made up some brochures for the Church of Nature’s God that I plan to leave lying around. Perhaps someone will be interested. Is this proselytizing. Hmm, I suppose that it is, but unlike the door-to-door Christians around here, this is pretty passive.

I will be sharing my convention experiences here. I hope it lives up to expectations. Being de-Baptised sounds inspirational.

Posted in Church | Leave a Comment »

Earlier reflections

Posted by Reflections on October 20, 2008

The following reflections were brought over from the website when the Blog was created:

Not all Deism forums and sites are closely compatible with the Church. Some are positive and constructive, some are negative and critical. The favors a positive approach. We do not find bashing Christians, Jews, Muslims and other revealed religionists to be a very constructive way of spending one’s time. It’s been done over and over again. If people want to point out the errors and inconsistencies of revealed religion, all they need do is point once and not belabor the point.

Some Deist forums are apolitical, some are highly political. Some Deist discussion groups maintain a separate area for political discussion. This is best. Some Deist groups have many members who use the discussion groups almost purely as a bully pulpit for their political views, and seldom discuss Deism. The Church encourages reason in all things, politics included. Religion and politics are too easily mixed. Separating political discussion on a religious discussion board makes good sense. In any group there are a lot of interpersonal dynamics, not all of which are healthy. There are cliques, as there are in all Internet forums. Board moderators need to have fair and firm policies prohibiting personal attacks. When this is lacking, the group will lack credibility in the Church’s eyes and will not be promoted on the Website or the Blog.

Posted in Church | Leave a Comment »

So what is a Reflection?

Posted by Reflections on October 19, 2008

A reflection is a thought. So reflections here are thoughts about nature, spirituality, morality and life in general. The Church of Nature’s God has no tenets, no dogma, no required way of thinking, so reflecting is a way of expressing thoughts publicly so that others may reflect on them also.

To date, the Church of Nature’s God has been a static website. It is time for it to become dynamic. The Reflections Blog is the beginning of that process.

Posted in Church | Leave a Comment »